Skip to content
Redmoon Calculators
텍스트 분석 EN only

Text Cohesion & Transition Analyzer

전환어 사용, 단락 연결, 대명사 참조 일관성, 갑작스러운 주제 전환을 측정합니다.

한국어에는 적합하지 않음

이 도구는 영어(와 일부 관련 언어)용으로 보정되었습니다. 한국어의 결과는 신뢰할 수 없습니다.

사용 시기

Use on essays, blog posts, and long-form articles where ideas need to flow from paragraph to paragraph. Marketing copy often *should* score lower (direct, punchy).

비교

Most readability tools miss cohesion entirely. A 5th-grade Flesch score with zero transitions still reads as choppy.

0 chars

작동 방식

The analyzer scans for five families of connective phrases — addition, contrast, cause, sequence, example — and counts their density.

Paragraph linkage measures the % of paragraphs that begin with an explicit transition. Pronoun ratio captures referential cohesion.

The composite score blends transition density (40%), paragraph linkage (30%), and pronoun cohesion (30%).

자주 묻는 질문

What is cohesion vs. coherence?

Cohesion is the local glue between sentences (transitions, pronouns). Coherence is the global logic of the whole text. This tool measures cohesion.

What target score should I aim for?

60+ is healthy for essays and articles. Marketing copy can score lower (more direct, fewer transitions).

Why does it flag paragraphs with no transition?

Each new paragraph should signal how it relates to the previous one. Starting cold often loses readers.

실제 예시

입력

I tried the new café. The coffee was strong. The pastry was fresh. I will go back.

출력

Cohesion: 28 / 100 — Choppy.

Four short sentences in a row with zero transitions and no pronouns linking back. Cohesion is low even though every sentence is grammatical.

흔한 함정

  • High transition density isn't automatically good — overuse signals AI-style padding.
  • Pronoun ratio can be inflated by dialogue.
  • Doesn't evaluate logical coherence — only surface cohesion.

관련 도구

피드백 보내기

모든 메시지를 읽습니다. 무엇을 개선하면 좋을지, 좋았던 점은 무엇인지 알려주세요.