Skip to content
Redmoon Calculators
文本分析 EN only

Text Cohesion & Transition Analyzer

测量过渡词使用、段落链接、代词参考一致性以及突然的主题转移。

未针对 简体中文 设计

该工具针对英语(和一些相近语言)校准。简体中文 的结果可能不准确。

何时使用

Use on essays, blog posts, and long-form articles where ideas need to flow from paragraph to paragraph. Marketing copy often *should* score lower (direct, punchy).

与其他指标对比

Most readability tools miss cohesion entirely. A 5th-grade Flesch score with zero transitions still reads as choppy.

0 chars

工作原理

The analyzer scans for five families of connective phrases — addition, contrast, cause, sequence, example — and counts their density.

Paragraph linkage measures the % of paragraphs that begin with an explicit transition. Pronoun ratio captures referential cohesion.

The composite score blends transition density (40%), paragraph linkage (30%), and pronoun cohesion (30%).

常见问题

What is cohesion vs. coherence?

Cohesion is the local glue between sentences (transitions, pronouns). Coherence is the global logic of the whole text. This tool measures cohesion.

What target score should I aim for?

60+ is healthy for essays and articles. Marketing copy can score lower (more direct, fewer transitions).

Why does it flag paragraphs with no transition?

Each new paragraph should signal how it relates to the previous one. Starting cold often loses readers.

示例

输入

I tried the new café. The coffee was strong. The pastry was fresh. I will go back.

输出

Cohesion: 28 / 100 — Choppy.

Four short sentences in a row with zero transitions and no pronouns linking back. Cohesion is low even though every sentence is grammatical.

常见陷阱

  • High transition density isn't automatically good — overuse signals AI-style padding.
  • Pronoun ratio can be inflated by dialogue.
  • Doesn't evaluate logical coherence — only surface cohesion.

相关工具

发送反馈

我们会阅读每一条消息。告诉我们可以改进什么或你喜欢什么。