Skip to content
Redmoon Calculators
Análisis de texto EN only

Text Cohesion & Transition Analyzer

Mide el uso de conectores, vinculación de párrafos, consistencia de referencias pronominales y cambios abruptos de tema. Resalta transiciones débiles y sugiere frases de conexión.

No diseñado para Español

Esta herramienta fue calibrada para inglés (y algunos idiomas relacionados). Los resultados en Español podrían no ser significativos.

Cuándo usarlo

Use on essays, blog posts, and long-form articles where ideas need to flow from paragraph to paragraph. Marketing copy often *should* score lower (direct, punchy).

Cómo se compara

Most readability tools miss cohesion entirely. A 5th-grade Flesch score with zero transitions still reads as choppy.

0 chars

Cómo funciona

The analyzer scans for five families of connective phrases — addition, contrast, cause, sequence, example — and counts their density.

Paragraph linkage measures the % of paragraphs that begin with an explicit transition. Pronoun ratio captures referential cohesion.

The composite score blends transition density (40%), paragraph linkage (30%), and pronoun cohesion (30%).

Preguntas frecuentes

What is cohesion vs. coherence?

Cohesion is the local glue between sentences (transitions, pronouns). Coherence is the global logic of the whole text. This tool measures cohesion.

What target score should I aim for?

60+ is healthy for essays and articles. Marketing copy can score lower (more direct, fewer transitions).

Why does it flag paragraphs with no transition?

Each new paragraph should signal how it relates to the previous one. Starting cold often loses readers.

Ejemplo práctico

Entrada

I tried the new café. The coffee was strong. The pastry was fresh. I will go back.

Salida

Cohesion: 28 / 100 — Choppy.

Four short sentences in a row with zero transitions and no pronouns linking back. Cohesion is low even though every sentence is grammatical.

Errores comunes

  • High transition density isn't automatically good — overuse signals AI-style padding.
  • Pronoun ratio can be inflated by dialogue.
  • Doesn't evaluate logical coherence — only surface cohesion.

Herramientas relacionadas

Enviar comentarios

Leemos cada mensaje. Cuéntanos qué se puede mejorar o qué te gusta.