Skip to content
Redmoon Calculators
Text analysis

Adverb / -ly Word Detector

Detect -ly adverbs in your text and compute the adverb rate. Pinpoint the sentences with the heaviest adverb load and edit toward leaner prose.

Built and maintained by Paul Clark, Redmoon Software · Changes and corrections

When to use this

Use the adverb detector when editing fiction, marketing copy, or any writing where pace and vividness matter. Hemingway-style guidance targets adverb rates under 4%; tight ad copy often goes below 2%.

How it compares

Adverb detection is a stylistic metric, like passive voice — it surfaces patterns rather than scoring difficulty. Use alongside the Filler-Word Detector for a fuller weak-prose audit.

0 chars

How it works

The detector flags every -ly word in the text, excluding a stoplist of -ly words that aren't adverbs (family, lovely, jelly, etc.).

Adverb rate is the percentage of words that are adverbs. Hemingway-style writing keeps the rate below 4%; tight ad copy often stays under 2%.

Strict mode also skips -ly words whose stem is shorter than three letters (such as "only" and "rely"); it does not check the stem against a dictionary.

FAQs

Why are adverbs considered weak writing?

Stephen King's rule: "The road to hell is paved with adverbs." They're a sign you chose a weak verb that needed propping up. "Ran quickly" → "sprinted".

What about non-adverb -ly words?

Family, lovely, jelly, etc. — these are excluded from the count. Strict mode also drops -ly words with a stem under three letters, such as "only" and "rely"; it does not check against a dictionary of adjectives.

What's a good adverb rate?

Under 4% for tight prose. Under 2% for ad copy. Some genres (literary fiction) tolerate higher rates by design.

Worked example

Input

"She quickly opened the door and softly whispered her name."

Output

2 adverbs in 10 words (20% adverb rate) — heavy.

"Quickly" and "softly" both weaken stronger verb choices. "She flung the door open and whispered her name" reads tighter and more vivid.

Common pitfalls

  • Many -ly words aren't adverbs (family, lovely, jelly) — strict mode helps but isn't foolproof.
  • Some adverbs are essential ("quickly noted", "rapidly evolving") — don't cut them mechanically.
  • Manner adverbs paired with weak verbs are the prime targets; sentence adverbs ("however", "additionally") often stay.
  • Dialogue tags ("she whispered softly") are common offenders — "she whispered" usually suffices.

An -ly test with an exclusion list

Adverbs are found by looking for words ending in "-ly" that are longer than three characters and are not on an exclusion list. That list exists because "-ly" is not a reliable adverb marker in English: "family", "supply", "reply", "early" and "jelly" all end in it without being adverbs. The list is short, so adjectives such as "friendly", "costly" and "likely" are still counted.

Strict mode adds one more rule: the part before "-ly" must be at least three letters long. That drops short words such as "only", "duly", "idly" and "rely" and nothing else; it does not check the stem against a dictionary of adjectives. The two modes usually differ by very little, so use the same one whenever you compare drafts.

What to do with the ones it finds

The useful ones to cut are the intensifiers propping up a weak verb: "walked slowly" wants "ambled", "said loudly" wants "shouted", "very quickly" wants "instantly". Replacing the pair with one precise verb is almost always an improvement, and that is the edit the tool is really pointing at.

The ones to keep are adverbs carrying information the verb cannot: "she deliberately misread it" means something different without "deliberately", and no verb replaces it. Sentence adverbs — "however", "consequently", "arguably" — are structural signposts and cutting them damages the argument.

A high count is a prompt to look, not a fault to fix. Fiction runs higher than technical writing and that is a genre difference, not a defect.

Read more about this

Related tools

Send feedback

We read every message. Tell us what could be better or what you love.